The view may be hot, but the sex is not.


on November 30, 2011 by Pete Hammond

shamereview.pngEvery so often a hot potato sex movie comes around, challenges the rating system, gets compared to Last Tango in Paris and manages to draw a curious audience to see what the fuss is all about. Shame, an indulgent drama about the sexual, emotional and moral free-fall of a sex obsessed New York man premiered at the Venice Film Festival earning lots of buzz as this season's au courant shocker. With an effective if not likeable lead performance from Michael Fassbender and a game change of pace for recent ‘it' girl Carey Mulligan, it would seem the intent of Shame is to show us how far down one person can fall into sex addiction, but the real question will be: Does anyone really care? Initial business during its limited arthouse release December 2nd should be brisk, but without some significant awards action the patience for all of this may wear very thin. Its rare NC-17 won't help in the long run but could provide another motivating factor for the curious.

There can be no doubt writer/director Steve McQueen is a serious filmmaker. He had a nice calling card with Hunger, at least to critics who continue to champion his minimalist style. Hunger established it and Shame cements it, although the new film is likely to be more accessible than the latter (which also featured Fassbender). Holding shots for many minutes at a time, employing extreme close ups and letting his actors do the heavy lifting McQueen is the auteur darling of the moment and despite some questionable filmmaking tendencies he has undeniable talent and clear ideas of the story he wants to tell. The problem for some is they just won't want to hear it.

Fassbender plays Brandon, a good looking New Yorker who falls victim to his own sex drive, an obsession that takes him spiraling out of control as his seeming quest to feel nothing sets his meter to self-destruct. This is complicated by the arrival of his drifting sister Sissy (Muligan) who invades his attractive, if antiseptic, Manhattan apartment. She obviously has her own problems and their oddly kinky relationship does no favors for either one.

It's clear McQueen is trying to say something about the tenuous hold we all have on human longing and with these actors the film definitely has its moments. Yet it lacks the power of something like Nicolas Cage's descent in Leaving Las Vegas or the daring bravado of Brando in the aforementioned Last Tango. Fassbender nevertheless gives it his alland then some. It's a raw, naked performance (both literally and figuratively) and the extensive nude scenes and distant, unemotional sex make for a demanding part, one he fulfills about as well as anyone could. Mulligan is also in for extensive nudity and humiliation and pushes her career in challenging new directions. One downside of her performance has her singing a rendition of "New York New York" so long there might be lyrics in there Liza Minnelli hasn't even heard.

Overall it's a game effort but despite its strong ambitions and provocative themes, Shame may leave you just like its main protagonistin need of a very cold shower.

Distributor: Fox Searchlight Pictures
Cast: Michael Fassbender, Carey Mulligan, James Badge Dale, Nicole Beharie
Director: Steve McQueen
Screenwriters: Steve McQueen and Abi Morgan
Producers: Iain Canning and Emile Sherman
Genre: Drama
Rating: NC-17 for some explicit sexual content.
Running Time: 99 min.
Release Date: Dec 2 ltd.



Tags: Michael Fassbender, Carey Mulligan, James Badge Dale, Nicole Beharie, Steve McQueen, Abi Morgan, Iain Canning, Emile Sherman

read all Reviews »


  • jetsetter on 28 December 2011

    I wholeheartedly disagree. I was about to go on about how much I hate this review, but the real question will be: Does anyone really care? (See what I did there?) Just...ugh. "The view is hot, but the sex is not"? It's not supposed to be. It's a film about a sex addict, not a porn star. A life of a sex addict (even a scorching hot one like Michael Fassbender) is SAD. That was the whole point of this film. As a society, we've only started hearing about sex addiction recently in the mainstream thanks to Tiger Woods and the slew of celebs that followed, and started doubting its legitimate existence because it seemed like a good cop-out for cheating and other debaucherous behavior. Attend just one Sex Addicts Anonymous meeting and see for yourself...this is no joke. They are just as sick as any alcoholic at an AA meeting, if not more...because you can put down the bottle at some point and say "no" for good, but sex isn't like that. So yes, this film will leave you needing a cold shower, but its voyeuristic style doesn't glamorize the life of a sex addict. It makes you feel sorry for one, and if that's what Steve McQueen was intending, he succeeded.

  • Adele on 14 March 2012

    ...and I wholeheartedly agree with the comment by Jetsetter above. Without even knowing the name of the reveiwer above, one can tell he or she (but something tells me it's a he) has completely missed the point. It's handy though, because if this person ever tries to disuade me from viewing another clever fim such as Shame in the future, I'll know that I should run and see it! 2nd point: minimalist style is good. I know it's fun to be distracted by unrelenting explosions and other visual effects (not really, but this reviewer seems like the type who would like these lazy type of films), but the problem is that the narrative sort of disappears in these 'films'. Film should have the potential to change the world, or at least the way we see things, to open our eyes and surprise us. At least for a little while. Steve McQueen is a director who intimately understands this. Bravo Mr McQueen.

What do you think?